California v. Health & Human Servs.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. See Dkt. No. 174. In short, Plaintiffs seek to prevent the implementation of rules creating a religious exemption (the "Religious Exemption") and a moral exemption (the "Moral Exemption") to the contraceptive mandate contained within the Affordable Care Act ("ACA"). See id. at 1; Religious Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act, 83 Fed. Reg. 57,536 (Nov. 15, 2018) ("Religious Exemption");
*1271Moral…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth of MA v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Pennsylvania v. TrumpDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- State v. AzarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Irish 4 Reproductive Health v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- Motaghedi v. BlinkenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020