Sagan v. Apple Computer, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
BAIRD, District Judge.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss, motion for a more definite statement, and motion to strike came on regularly for hearing before this Court on June 27,1994. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and all other matters presented to the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss claims six and seven in Plaintiffs complaint is GRANTED, and that Defendant’s motions for a more definite statement and to strike are DENIED.
I.Background
On April 5, 1994, Carl Sagan (“Plaintiff’) initiated this action against Apple Computer,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Bureerong v. UvawasDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Neveu v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
- Sanchez v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Inman v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Herd v. Cnty. of San BernardinoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.