Legal Opinion

Inman v. Anderson

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 27, 2018No. Case No. 17-CV-04470-LHKPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Bruce Inman ("Plaintiff") filed an amended civil rights complaint against Defendants S. Anderson ("Officer Anderson"), Guillermo Vasquez ("Officer Vasquez"), Dana Rannals ("Officer Rannals"), Pedro Zamora ("Officer Zamora"), Leo Moreno ("Officer Moreno"), the City of Capitola, Steven J. Moore ("ADA Moore"), and the County of Santa Cruz (collectively, "Defendants"). In his amended complaint, Plaintiff asserts five causes of action arising out of his arrest, investigation, and prosecution for allegedly annoying or molesting a child in violation…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. (PC) Crane v. LopezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  2. (PC) Davis v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. (PC) John E. Mitchell v. BaezaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Porter v. IcbanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (PC)Wilson v. Mule Creek State PrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API