Legal Opinion
Mt. Airy Refining Co. v. Schlesinger
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 21, 1979No. Civ. A. CA 79-1366PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PENN, District Judge.
This comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment which address plaintiffs’ motion to enjoin the implementation of Department of Energy amendments to the domestic crude oil allocation plan, published on May 2, 1979 at 44 Federal Register 25621. 1
Plaintiffs are seven individual corporations, each of which owns a crude oil refinery plant with capacity to refine no more than 15,000 barrels of crude oil per day. Under the terms of 15 U.S.C. § 752(4), these refiners are termed “small refiners”. They seek to enjoin the Secretary of Energy, and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Pacific Power & Light Co. v. DuncanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1980
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Guy v. GlickmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.