Legal Opinion

Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Duncan

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 21, 1980No. Civ. 80-82PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

PANNER, Judge.

OVERVIEW

Rate increases for electricity distributed by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) were proposed by its Administrator. An Assistant Secretary of the Department of Energy (DOE) approved the rates on an interim basis under authority delegated to her by the Secretary of Energy. Pursuant to the same delegation order, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is now reviewing the proposed rate changes. Pacific Power & Light (PP&L) filed this suit against the Secretary, the Assistant Secretary, and the Administrator, challenging the interim rates.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Tex-La Electric Cooperative, Inc., United States of America v. Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. City of Fulton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Montana Power Co. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1981
  4. Overton Power District No. 5 v. WatkinsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1993
  5. United States v. Tex-La Electric Cooperative, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API