Legal Opinion
Pace v. Paris Maintenance Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 12, 2000No. 98 Civ. 1470 RWSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Corporate Property Investors (“CPI”), Pembrook Management Company (“Pembrook”), Joseph Galea (“Galea”), and Paris Maintenance Company (“Paris”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have moved, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P., for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint of Emilio Pace (“Pace”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted.
The Parties
Pace is a former employee of Paris and of Pembrook. He resides in Brooklyn, New York.
Paris, Pembrook, and CPI are New York corporations with their principal places of business in Manhattan.
Galea…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Sussle v. Sirina Protection Systems Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Tomney v. International Center for the Disabled & Local 815District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exxon Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
- Patane v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.