Legal Opinion
Patane v. Clark
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 21, 2006No. 05 CIV. 10219(WCC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge
Plaintiff Eleanora M. Patane brings this action claiming discriminatory treatment based on gender and retaliation in violation of (1) Title VII, 42 U.S.C.2000e, et seq.; (2) the New York Human Rights Law (“NYHRL”), New York Executive Law § 296; and (3) the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), New York City Administrative Code § 8-101, et seq. against defendants John Richard Clark, Harry B. Evans, David Stuhr, Georgina Arendacs (the “individual defendants”) and Fordham University (“Ford-ham”) (collectively “defendants”).…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Patane v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- International Healthcare Exchange, Inc. v. Global Healthcare Exchange, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Banks v. Correctional Services Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Mazyck v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Hall v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.