Loyer v. Buchholz
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The issue presented by this cause is whether, by virtue of R.C. 1533.181, a residential pool owner is immune from a suit for damages resulting from injuries sustained *66in the pool by a social guest. We hold that R.C. 1533.181 does not confer immunity where the land on which the injury occurred is not kept open to the general public for gratuitous recreational use.
R.C. 1533.181 provides:
“(A) No owner, lessee, or occupant of premises:
“(1) Owes any duty to a recreational user to keep the premises safe for entry or use;
“(2) Extends any assurance to a recreational user, through the act of giving…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Johnson v. Village of New LondonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Moss v. Dept. of Natural ResourcesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Marrek v. Cleveland Metroparks Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Mitchell v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Miller v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Perrine v. Kennecott Mining Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Kimberly Ann Sallee, Individually and as Next Friend of Lucas Gregory Durkop and Maria Christina Rivera, Matthew James Sallee, and James Allan Sallee v. Matthew R. Stewart and Diana Stewart D/B/A Stewartland HolsteinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Cassio v. Creighton UniversityNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Estate of Gordon-Couture v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.