Legal Opinion

Perrine v. Kennecott Mining Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1996No. 940610PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

David Perrine, individually and as guardian ad litem for his four-year-old son Ryan, and Kimberly Perrine, Ryan’s mother, appeal from the Third District Court’s grant of defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motions, holding that the Perrines’ claims were barred under Utah’s Limitation of Landowner Liability Act. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

Kennecott Mining Corporation (Kennecott) owns thirty acres of land which is central to the present controversy. In 1975, Kennecott leased this property to the Community Re creation…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Almgren v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bowen v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Scrapchansky v. Town of PlainfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Tschaggeny v. Milbank Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Z.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gohler v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API