Legal Opinion

Hickman County v. Nashville Bridge Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1933No. 6262PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

Objection is made by the appellee to a consideration of the questions argued on this appeal on the ground that the assignments of error are insufficient under rule 11 of this court. We think the assignments are too general, but it is within the province of the court to notice plain error not assigned (The Myrtle M. Ross, 160 F. 19, 20 (6 C. C. A.), and in view of the interests involved in the litigation we deem it appropriate to consider the questions presented on the face of the record, though the errors relating to them wero not assigned with the particularity that is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Burnett v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Railway Co. v. Wilson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hagan v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Lotspeich v. Mayor of MorristownTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. v. RoufosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API