Legal Opinion

Lotspeich v. Mayor of Morristown

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1918PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM HAMBLEN Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamblen County. —HoN. Hugh G-. Kyle, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The bill in this cause was filed by the complainant, A. W. Lotspeich, against the mayor and aldermen of the town of Morristown, seeking to enforce an award of arbitration made pursuant to an alleged arbitration agreement entered into in writing by W. B. Whittaker, mayor of the defendant, on August 3, 1916.

The defendant, mayor and aldermen of the town of Morristown, answered the bill, setting up in its answer the defense, by plea of non est factum, that the mayor was without authority to bind the city under said agreement, it appearing that said arbitration agreement executed by him was never…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bills v. City of GoshenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Johnston v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. People ex rel. Healy v. Clean Street Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. McCrowell v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
  5. Curran Bill Posting & Distributing v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dodd v. BannisterWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kelley v. Shelby County Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2016
  3. La Polla v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF UNION CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Warren v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  5. City of Rockwood v. C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API