New York Life Ins. v. Roufos
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The insurer disputes its liability under the double indemnity clause of an insur*621anee policy issued upon the life of Fotoni A. Roufos, deceased, on February 27, 1922, and appeals from a judgment below on the ground that there was no substantial evidence as to the cause of death, and that the court erroneously placed upon it the burden of establishing disease as a contributing canse.
The double indemnity clause of the policy is in the usual form, imposing liability upon the insurer for:
“Double the face of this policy upon receipt of due proof that the death of the insured…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Davlin v. Henry Ford & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Harrison v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky v. NoakesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Wallace v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Franklin v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Nieman v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Pettit v. United Benefit Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Griffin v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1943