Legal Opinion

Morse v. Walker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The plaintiffs having sustained their injuries in the State of Virginia, their right to recover therefor must be determined by the law of that jurisdiction. Wise v. Hollowell, 205 N. C. 286, 171 S. E. 82; *781Baird v. Baird, 223 N. C. 730, 28 S. E. (2) 225; Harper v. Harper, and Wickham v. Harper, 225 N. C. 260, 34 S. E. (2), 185.

The defendant contends that at the time the plaintiffs were injured they were his guests within the meaning of the Virginia guest statute, which reads as follows: “No person transported by the owner or operator of any motor vehicle as a guest without payment for such…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Kruy v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Chaplowe v. PowsnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Miller v. FairleyOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Smith v. CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Satterfield v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wolf v. HoltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Kizer v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Crow v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Woolf v. HoltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API