Legal Opinion

Alford v. Providence Hospital

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 14, 2011No. Civil Action 10-132 (JEB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.

After failing to obtain a new position with Defendant Providence Hospital, Plaintiff Sheila Alford, who requires the use of a wheelchair, brought this action alleging that she was passed over because of her disability. Following discovery, Defendant filed this Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that it hired a superior candidate for the position. Because no reasonable jury could find that Defendant’s hiring decision was a pretext for discrimination, the Court will grant Defendant’s Motion. 1

I. Background

Until recently, Plaintiff worked for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alford v. Providence HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Bailey v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Banker v. WormuthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API