Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hoohuli
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LEVINSON, J.
Wallace Yamamoto owned a dump truck which he had insured with Appellant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (hereinafter “U.S.F. & G.”). The policy contained the standard omnibus clause extending coverage of the policy to
any person or organization legally responsible for the use thereof, provided the actual use of the automobile is by the Named Insured or such spouse or with the permission of either.
The policy covered the truck for “COMMERCIAL” use, defined as “including occasional use for personal, pleasure, family and other business purposes.”
Yamamoto…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Matits v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- American Fidelity Co. v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Collins v. New York Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Dawes v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Estate of Doe v. Paul Revere Insurance GroupHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Dines v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Sol v. AIG Hawai'i Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.