Legal Opinion

Glass v. City of Lynn

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 8, 2000No. 98-P-197PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.

The plaintiffs are employed as police officers by the city of Lynn and are also members of the Army National Guard. In their complaint for declaratory relief, they claim that the defendant city did not properly compensate them under G. L. c. 33, § 59, for periods during which they were fulfilling their National Guard service obligation while on military leaves of absence from their city employment. Acting on cross motions for summary judgment, a Superior Court judge allowed that of the plaintiffs, declaring that the “seventeen day military allowance” of G. L. c. 33, § 59, is to be applied…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LydonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Hopkins v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Moulton v. Brookline Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Town of Milton v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adoption of DonaldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  2. Blackburn v. Daufuskie Island Fire DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Berkshire Aircraft, Inc. v. AEC Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  4. Robert Driscoll v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API