Legal Opinion

Lippolt v. Hague, 08ap-140 (9-30-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2008No. 08AP-140PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, William R. Hague, Inc. ("Hague"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, which granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Rodney W. Lippolt ("Lippolt"), regarding Lippolt's entitlement to participate in the Ohio Workers' Compensation Fund. For the following reasons, we affirm.

{¶ 2} Since 1999, Hague has employed Lippolt as a regional manager/factory representative, whose job functions include training, checking on product presentation, public relations, and being Hague's "eyes and ears" in the field with respect…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Coventry Township v. EckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Griffith v. Miamisburg, 08ap-557 (12-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Cunningham v. Bone Dry Waterproofing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Woodard v. Cassens Transport Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Cunningham v. Bone Dry Waterproofing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Kerr v. OhioHealth Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API