Legal Opinion
Campisano v. Nardi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 1989No. 13627PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the sole shareholder, officer and director of a corporation that has been dissolved by forfeiture can be held personally liable for the breach of a contract entered into by the corporation prior to its dissolution. The plaintiffs, Mark Campisano and Marsha McCoy, brought a two count cause of action against the defendant P. J. Nardi, Jr., charging him with breach of contract and fraud in relation to a contract that they had executed with P. J. Nardi, Jr., Inc., a corporation.1 The parties tried the case before attorney state trial referee Dennis G.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Zaist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Elgar v. ElgarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Season-All Industries, Inc. v. R. J. Grosso, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- American Wholesalers Underwriting, Ltd. v. American Wholesale Insurance Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.