Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1988No. A043383PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENSON, J.

We are asked to determine whether the trial court may refuse to hear a summary judgment motion filed within the time limits of Code of Civil Procedure section 437c. We determine it may not and find the local rule relied on by the trial court, as applied in this instance, is invalid since it conflicts with state law.

Petitioner Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., seeks a peremptory writ of mandate ordering the trial court to vacate its ruling ordering off calendar its motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication of issues. Petitioner asks us to order the trial court to hear and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Iverson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. St. Vincent Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. Superior Court (Lavi)California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mediterranean Constr. Co. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Kalivas v. Barry Controls Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Sierra Craft, Inc. v. Magnum Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API