Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Lavi)

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1993No. S022419PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS. C. J.

This case concerns the appropriate time to file a motion to disqualify a judge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 (all further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise indicated). The primary issue may be stated as follows: When a master calendar department assigns a case to a “long cause” criminal trial department 2 for “trial setting,” which, if any, of section 170.6, subdivision (2)’s timeliness requirements (the “master calendar” rule, the “all purpose assignment” rule, or the “10-day/5-day” rule) for making motions under that statute apply?…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. Superior Court (Hartway)California Supreme Court · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Steen v. Appellate Division, Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API