Legal Opinion

State v. Aradon (In re A.E.T.H.)

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 12, 2019No. 76964-2-I; consolidated with 77002-1-I, 77660-6-I, 77960-5-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

-*506¶1 The right to a fair trial before an impartial tribunal is a basic requirement of due process. Peters v. Kiff, 407 U.S. 493, 501, 92 S. Ct. 2163, 33 L. Ed. 2d 83 (1972). This right to due process is especially critical in a proceeding to terminate parental rights, where so much is at stake for both the parent and the child. Here, Nylysha Aradon and Carey Hayes seek reversal of the order terminating their parental rights to their daughter, A.H. They argue that they were denied a fair trial before an impartial tribunal. We agree. *671¶2 After the termination trial, and after extensive posttrial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Peters v. KiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Peters v. KiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re The Welfare Of: K.d., Danielle Graves v. DcyfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. In re Dependency of M.L.W.Washington Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State Of Washington v. Brennan PenroseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API