Legal Opinion

Jarrett v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1990No. 2337 and 2516PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

These cross-appeals are from the judgment entered on the verdict reached by the trial court after a non-jury trial. The court found Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (“PNI”) was liable to the Plaintiffs below for their claim for first-party benefits under the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 1701-1798 (amended). The court denied the Plaintiffs’ request for attorney’s fees. PNI’s appeal concerns the court’s finding of liability; the Plaintiffs appeal the denial of attorney’s fees. We vacate the judgment entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Falcione v. Cornell School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Pugh v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Boone v. Stonewall InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Estate of Sanchez v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Hansen Ex Rel. Hansen v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Rosado v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Bridges v. GarySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Esurance Ins. Servs., Inc. v. WeberDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API