Legal Opinion

Falcione v. Cornell School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1989No. 00781PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This direct appeal follows the entry of judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, Cornell School District, hereinafter Cornell. For the reasons which follow, we vacate the judgment.1

The simple factual background of this case is muddled considerably by the convoluted procedure surrounding it. The Plaintiff-Appellant, hereinafter Falcione, is employed by Cornell as a school principal and initiated the declaratory action below to settle a salary dispute with his employer. Falcione averred in his complaint that he was awarded a yearly salary increase commencing with the 1972-1973 school year,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Wojciechowski v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Wertz v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Lewis v. SpitlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Clearfield Bank & Trust Co. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa v. City SavingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Larry R. Moore v. Kulicke & Soffa Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  3. Refuse Management Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Recycling & Transfer Systems Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Donohoe v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Dinosaur Park Investments, L.L.C. v. TelloColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API