Legal Opinion

Nanz v. Park Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1899PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PROM CLAIBORWE. Appeal from Chancery Court of Claiborne County. Hugh G-. Kyle, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

The Cumberland Gap Park Company owned certain real estate at Harrogate, Tenn., upon which, was erected the Pour Seasons Hotel. Nanz & Neuner are florists at Louisville, Ky., and made a contract with the company, in writing, to furnish and plant flowers and shrubbery, to build a rustic bridge, and grade the walks and ways about the premises, for the aggregate sum of- $3,000. They carried out their contract, but received only part of the amount agreed to be paid, and there is a balance owing under the contract of $2,744.33, besides interest. Nanz & Neuner insist that they have a lien upon the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. McDermott v. ClaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Pilz v. KillingsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Steger v. Arctic Refrigerating Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Collins v. MottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Gatlinburg v. Charles Blalock & Sons, Inc. (In Re Just for the Fun of It of Tennessee, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
  2. Richardson v. LaniusTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Britt v. McClendonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Goldsmith v. Orange Belt Securities Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Owen Lumber & Millwork, Inc. v. National Equity Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API