Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Lanius

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The bill in this cause was filed by complainant, Richardson, against defendants J. R. Lanius, P. C. Dooley, and Mrs. Mattie Loftin.

Complainant sought a decree against defendants Lan-ius and Dooley for the sum of $785.55, with interest from the date of the filing of his bill, balance due for materials furnished Lanius and Dooley, who had a contract with Mrs. Loftin to remodel and make certain additions to her dwelling house situated on a certain lot mentioned and described in the bill located in the city of Columbia, Tenn., and to set up and enforce a furnisher’s lien for said materials which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Green v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Nanz v. Park Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bird Bros. v. Southern Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Sternberg v. Fort Smith Refrigerator WorksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Winter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  3. First National Bank of Gatlinburg v. Charles Blalock & Sons, Inc. (In Re Just for the Fun of It of Tennessee, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
  4. Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. E. W. Minter Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Thomas v. NoeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API