Legal Opinion

Steger v. Arctic Refrigerating Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 1, 1891PublishedCited by 18 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. Andrew Allison, Ch.

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson,- Sp. J.

The Arctic Refrigerating Company, a corporation created by the State of Tennessee, organized for manufacturing vapor to be used for “cold-storage,” erected in Nashville buildings, with appliances and machinery, necessary for that purpose.

As a part of its business it proposed to furnish cold vapor to consumers at a distance, supplying the same by pipes laid in the ground through the streets, connecting the storage compartments of such customers with the factory.

Appellant, Mrs. Medora Perry, a single woman, *455■who owned a machine-shop in the city of Nashville, supplied machinery…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Canal Co. v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Brooks v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Beatty v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd. v. Oconto Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1892
  2. S. B. Luttrell & Co. v. Knoxville, La Follette & Jellico RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. First National Bank of Gatlinburg v. Charles Blalock & Sons, Inc. (In Re Just for the Fun of It of Tennessee, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
  4. Wells v. ChristianIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Nanz v. Park Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API