Legal Opinion

Powers v. Secretary of Administration

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1992PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.

On September 11, 1991, in response to a recommendation from the Governor, the Senate and the House of Representatives (House) each passed to be enacted “An Act establishing a receivership for the city of Chelsea” (Receivership Act). St. 1991, c. 200. The Receivership Act provided, inter alia, that: (1) a “fiscal crisis” existed in Chelsea; (2) a receivership must be established and a receiver appointed by the Governor to an initial one year term “[i]n order to institute a comprehensive long-term solution to [Chelsea’s] financial problems”; (3) “[the] receiver shall be the chief executive…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. BergstromMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CarelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  2. First Justice of the Bristol Division of the Juvenile Court Department v. Clerk-magistrate of the Bristol Division of the Juvenile Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Libertarian Ass'n v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Canney v. City of ChelseaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  5. Alliance, AFSCME/SEIU, AFL-CIO v. Secretary of AdministrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API