Legal Opinion

Holton v. Moody

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari by Thomas Holton to review the action of Sherman B. Daboll, circuit judge of Gratiot county, in refusing to set aside certain sales of real estate upon executions issued against petitioner in suits instituted, respectively, by petitioner against Silas Moody, and by Martin Wolf against petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

These two cases present substantially the same questions. It is sought in each to review by certiorari the action of the circuit court in refusing to set aside a sale of real estate on execution. In each case a large number of technical objections are taken to the *322proceedings, relating to the time and order of filing the return of the sheriff, and the evidence of posting notices, etc. It is enough to say that when the cases were before the court there was evidence that each step required to be taken by the sheriff was taken within the time required by statute, and that all the proceedings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larzelere v. LarzelereMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hoffman v. BuschmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Geney v. MaynardMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Gleason v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Security Trust Co. v. SlomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Church v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API