Gleason v. Hill
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Placer County, denying a motion to set aside a sale under execution. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
The Code provides that “ when the sale (under execution) is of real property, consisting of several known lots or parcels, they must be sold separately.” (Code Civ Proc. § 694.) In this case the property, which consisted of four ditches and the water rights connected therewith, was sold in one parcel. The appellant contends that each ditch and the water right connected with it constituted a separate lot or parcel of real property, and should have been so sold. On the other side it is insisted that the several ditches and the water rights connected with them constitute a system of water…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Waterford Irrigation District v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Holton v. MoodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898