Legal Opinion

Security Trust Co. v. Sloman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 69, Calendar No. 35,205PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Under decree of foreclosure of a trust mortgage, affirmed by this court in 248 Mich. 419, sale was had of the whole premises described therein as one parcel. Defendant had demanded that the commissioner offer it in four parcels. Counsel agree that the sale was governed by the statute covering executions, which provides:

“When any real estate offered for sale by virtue of any execution, shall consist of several known lots, tracts, or parcels, such lots, tracts, or parcels, shall be separately exposed for sale, and the defendant may direct which piece or parcel shall be first exposed for sale;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. ShaperoMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Thomas v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. O'Connor v. KeenanMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Geney v. MaynardMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Holton v. MoodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Sweet Air Investment, Inc v. KenneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In Re Woodmere Investors Limited PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. Milton Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In Re Mount Pleasant Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API