Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dorius

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 2, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

The defendant’s appeal from his conviction under G. L. c. 272, § 28A, as amended through St. 1959, c. 492, § 2, was dismissed for want of jurisdiction (because of failure seasonably to obtain the application of Gr. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G-, to this case) in Commonwealth v. Dorius, 343 Mass. 533, 536. The trial judge (who heard the case without a jury in the Superior Court) has now reported several questions of law for our decision. G. L. c. 278, § 30.

1. There is no merit to the Commonwealth’s contention that the report is not properly before us. When the report was made, a stay of the sentence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Commonwealth v. SpoffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. WilkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. MascoloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  3. Asker v. AskerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. People v. GrossmanNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API