Commonwealth v. Dorius
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
The defendant’s appeal from his conviction under G. L. c. 272, § 28A, as amended through St. 1959, c. 492, § 2, was dismissed for want of jurisdiction (because of failure seasonably to obtain the application of Gr. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G-, to this case) in Commonwealth v. Dorius, 343 Mass. 533, 536. The trial judge (who heard the case without a jury in the Superior Court) has now reported several questions of law for our decision. G. L. c. 278, § 30.
1. There is no merit to the Commonwealth’s contention that the report is not properly before us. When the report was made, a stay of the sentence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Commonwealth v. SpoffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Commonwealth v. WilkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Commonwealth v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. MascoloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Asker v. AskerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- People v. GrossmanNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.