Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
In this action for writ of mandate we are called upon to determine whether law enforcement officers have used sufficiently “sensitive tools”1 in attempting to curb alleged obscenity.
Plaintiffs (hereinafter called petitioners) appeal from an adverse judgment on their complaint for writ of mandate to compel respondent to return an allegedly obscene film seized at the time of their arrest. We are not called upon in this proceeding to ascertain whether the film is in law or fact obscene.
Petitioners contend that the seizure of the film without a search warrant or other judicial determination of…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- In Re GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Burton v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People Ex Rel. Busch v. Projection Room TheaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cambist Films, Inc. v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.