Legal Opinion

People v. Grossman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1965PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNathah B. Sobee, J.

The principal issue (one not heretofore decided by an appellate court) presented by these motions to suppress (Code Crim. Pro., § 813-c) and to dismiss the indictment, is: 11 May an ex parte order for eavesdropping (Code Crim. Pro., § 813-a) serve the function of a search warrant under the Warrant Clause of the Fourth Amendment to authorise a physical invasion (trespass) upon a constitutionally protected area in a ‘ search ’ for conversationsf ”

Other subsidiary constitutional issues are raised. But these are well settled, if not by decision of the appellate courts in this State, by the…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. O'BREMSKIWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. PaulinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. People v. McDonough, New York County Courts1966
  5. People v. BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API