Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clapp v. Cass County

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1975No. Civ. 9119Published

1Dissent

VOGEL, Justice, joined by PEDERSON, Justice (dissenting).

The question to be decided in this case is simply whether the North Dakota Tax Commissioner must follow the statutory definition of “market value” in arriving at the assessed valuation of “flower” bonds, or whether he is at liberty to substitute a different valuation, par value, simply because the bonds can be used at a higher valuation for the specific purpose of paying Federal estate taxes.

I

North Dakota’s basic scheme for estate taxation was established in 1927 by Chapter 267, 1927 Session Laws. It provided, in Section 6:

“All…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Company, as of the Will of Harriet Delta Ellis, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Little v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Snidow v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Horst v. GuyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Butler v. &198tna Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API