Legal Opinion
Horst v. Guy
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1974No. Civ. 9008PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEIGEN, Judge.
This is the sequel to Horst v. Guy, 211 N.W.2d 723 (N.D.1973), and involves the construction and validity of the Vietnam Conflict Veterans’ Adjusted Compensation Act (Chapter 37-25, N.D.C.C.). This is an action which Horst, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, has brought against the Governor and the Adjutant General of the State of North Dakota for the purpose of securing payment of adjusted compensation (veteran’s bonus) under the Act. In our former opinion we held: (1) that the action was maintainable as a class action; (2) that Section 37-25-02(8) (d),…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. Gamble Skogmo, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Asbury Hospital v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. JohannesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Menz v. CoyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Hjelle v. Sornsin Construction CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Newman Signs, Inc. v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Hilton v. North Dakota Education Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Apple Creek Township v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Fargo, Cass County v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Morton County v. HenkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.