Legal Opinion

State v. Thornton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 16, 2015No. 32478-8-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence-Berrey, J.

¶1 Cynthia Thornton was convicted of possession of a controlled substance — heroin. The sentencing court imposed a $100 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) collection fee as a mandatory legal financial obligation (LFO) under RCW 43.43.7541. Ms. Thornton appeals, contending the court erred in imposing the DNA collection fee because she had already submitted a DNA sample for a prior conviction. We find no merit to her contention and affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

¶2 At Ms. Thornton’s April 10, 2014 sentencing hearing, the court imposed certain LFOs including the $100 DNA collection fee. The court then told…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Washington Public Ports Ass'n v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Lucien J. ThibodeauxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. State Of Washington v. Tommie LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. State Of Washington v. Nicholas Windsor AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. State of Washington v. William P. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State Of Washington v. Joseph UeltzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API