State v. Thornton
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence-Berrey, J.
¶1 Cynthia Thornton was convicted of possession of a controlled substance — heroin. The sentencing court imposed a $100 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) collection fee as a mandatory legal financial obligation (LFO) under RCW 43.43.7541. Ms. Thornton appeals, contending the court erred in imposing the DNA collection fee because she had already submitted a DNA sample for a prior conviction. We find no merit to her contention and affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
¶2 At Ms. Thornton’s April 10, 2014 sentencing hearing, the court imposed certain LFOs including the $100 DNA collection fee. The court then told…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Washington Public Ports Ass'n v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Lucien J. ThibodeauxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Tommie LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Nicholas Windsor AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State of Washington v. William P. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Joseph UeltzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.