People v. Palumbo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
By the first- count of the information appellants were charged with the crime of robbery, committed on the third day of February, 1932. By the second count they were charged with grand larceny committed on said third day of February, by stealing an automobile. They were tried together and were convicted on both counts. They present separate appeals from the judgments and from the orders denying their motions for a new trial.
It is contended by appellants that the two offenses were improperly joined in the same information, the alleged crimes being not connected together in their commission and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. DegnenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. WashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. RinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. MainhurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.