Legal Opinion

People v. Mainhurst

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1945No. Crim. 3855PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of grand theft, after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals.

There is also an appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), the essential facts are:

On November 23, 1943, Mr. Karsh left his Cadillac sedan in front of 1388 West Washington Boulevard, Los Angeles. When he came out of the building he discovered that his automobile was gone. About fifteen minutes later he located his automobile at Twenty-fourth and Hoover Streets. There was no one in the car, but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. JeffriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. WiezelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. MeyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. CahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. People v. PalumboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. State v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. IsraelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API