Legal Opinion

People v. Bingham

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1941No. Crim. No. 3426PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Prom a judgment of guilty of robbery in the first degree after trial before a jury and from an order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.

Viewing the evidence most favorably to the people (respondent), the essential facts are:

August 11, 1940, about 9 P. M. defendant and his codefendant Earl Bingham approached an attendant at a service station in the city of Los Angeles and requested permission to use the rest room. A few minutes later defendant ordered the attendant to accompany him into the rest room. As they entered the rest room defendant directed his eodefendant to go to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BurkhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. CatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. People v. PalumboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BorbonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. People v. RinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Territory of Hawaii v. AbellanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API