People v. Bingham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Prom a judgment of guilty of robbery in the first degree after trial before a jury and from an order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.
Viewing the evidence most favorably to the people (respondent), the essential facts are:
August 11, 1940, about 9 P. M. defendant and his codefendant Earl Bingham approached an attendant at a service station in the city of Los Angeles and requested permission to use the rest room. A few minutes later defendant ordered the attendant to accompany him into the rest room. As they entered the rest room defendant directed his eodefendant to go to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BurkhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. CatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. PalumboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BorbonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. RinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Territory of Hawaii v. AbellanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1950