Legal Opinion
Huthnance v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 16, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2006-1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently pending and ready for resolution is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production (“Plains.Mot.”) [# 148]. For the reasons stated below, a ruling on plaintiffs motion will be deferred until after the court has had an opportunity for an in camera review of the document at issue.
BACKGROUND
In brief, plaintiff claims that she was falsely arrested and detained by three officers of the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”). Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) at 2. She is suing the three officers for 1) false arrest, 2)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Vaughn v. RosenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Americans for Fair Treatment v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Energy Policy Advocates v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Mannina v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- National Public Radio, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022