Legal Opinion

Mannina v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 6, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2015-0931Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) VICTORIA MANNINA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-931 (KBJ/RMM) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Victoria Mannina (“Plaintiff” or “Ms. Mannina”) filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld by Defendant as Privileged, or in the Alternative, for In Camera Review of Withheld Documents (“Motion”). See generally Pl.’s Mot., ECF No. 83. In that motion, Ms. Mannina challenges Defendant District of Columbia’s (“Defendant” or “the District”) assertion of the deliberative…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API