Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harris

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1988No. 423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. Court-appointed counsel for appellant filed an Anders brief claiming that the issues appellant raises are frivolous and requesting permission to withdraw from the case. We determine that counsel has complied with Anders and grant counsel’s request to withdraw. In addition, we find that the issues raised on appeal are without merit and, therefore, affirm the order of the trial court.

In October 1975, appellant was found guilty by jury of second-degree murder, conspiracy,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. Reichle, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1991
  4. Commonwealth v. SheppardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API