Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Perry

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1988No. 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Appellant Walter Perry seeks relief from the denial, without a hearing, of his petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (“PCHA”), 42 Pa.C.S. § 9541 et. seq. Perry’s *424court-appointed attorney simultaneously requests permission to withdraw on the basis that Perry presents no meritorious grounds for review. Since we agree with counsel’s assessment that this appeal is frivolous, we grant permission to withdraw, and affirm the dismissal of Perry’s PCHA petition.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. Perry was convicted by a jury on January 8, 1981 of robbery, theft, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. SawyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. RauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MapleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. FosterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API