Legal Opinion
United States v. Ramstad Construction Co.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided May 25, 1961No. Civ. A-54-60PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGE, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action under the provisions of the Miller Act (See. 270b, Title 40 U.S.C.A.), also alleging jurisdiction of the court by reason of a federal question (Sec. 1331, Title 28 U.S. C.A.) inapplicable here, and by reason of diversity of citizenship (Sec. 1332, Title 28 U.S.C.A.). The action is based upon a subcontract between the use plaintiff as subcontractor and the defendant Ramstad Construction Co. as prime contractor, covering specified portions of work required of the defendant under a contract with the United States of America for the furnishing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Cahill v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Continental Casualty Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States of America for the Use and Benefit of J. P. Byrne & Co., Inc. v. Fire Association of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- United States Ex Rel. E & R Construction Co. v. Guy H. James Construction Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972
- Arizona Gunite Builders, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Moran Towing Corporation v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Pennwalt Corp. v. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.