Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Regan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1959PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

This case involves the question of whether a patent for a particular article, invented by defendant employee, belongs to him or to his employers, the plaintiffs herein. The trial court found in favor of the defendant; the Appellate Division modified the judgment, deciding that, although the patent belonged to the defendant, the plaintiffs had a “ shop right” to use it. Both parties have cross-appealed to this court.

The plaintiffs, in their capacity as executors of the estate of the deceased William Boberts, are carrying on the business which Boberts had owned during his lifetime, the Melvina…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Rentways, Inc. v. O'Neill Milk & Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Steranko v. Inforex, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  3. Peterson v. ReginaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Mardan Corp. v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd.District Court, D. Arizona · 1984
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API