Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. E & R Construction Co. v. Guy H. James Construction Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided September 5, 1972No. Civ. A. 504PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MORTON, District Judge.
This action was commenced on September 28, 1967, by plaintiff E & R Construction Co., Inc. based upon the provisions of the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a and 270b. The plaintiff is an Ohio corporation. Defendant, Guy H. James Construction Company, is an Oklahoma corporation, and defendant Federal In surance Company is a New Jersey corporation which is authorized by the United States to write performance and payment bonds under the terms of the Miller Act.
On June 26, 1964, defendant Guy H. James Construction Company (hereinafter “James”) entered into a…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- John W. Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New York Corporation and Volkswagenwerk, A. G., a Foreign Corporation, Wolfsburg, Western GermanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Lexicon, Inc. v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Blake Construction Co. v. C. J. Coakley Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Action Ads, Inc. v. William B. Tanner Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- ACG, INC. v. Southeast Elevator, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.