Legal Opinion

State v. Brandon H. Bentdahl

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2013No. 2012AP001426PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. This is a review of an unpublished court of appeals' decision that reversed the circuit court. The petitioner, the State, asks this court to determine whether State v. Brooks 2 applies when a defendant fails to request a refusal hearing within the statutory ten-day time limit and chooses to plead not guilty to the underlying operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) or OWI-related offense. The State further asks this court to determine whether Brooks continues to be good law considering Wisconsin's implied consent statute, Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (2009-10). 3

¶ 2. This case arises…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. NeitzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CastilloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. GraciaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Village of Elm Grove v. Richard K. BrefkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Dawn M. PradoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  2. City of Crandon v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API