Legal Opinion
State v. Neitzel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1980No. 77-119PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The county court directed the Administrator of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Department of Transportation to suspend Franklin J. Neitzel’s driving privileges for a period of sixty days because of Neitzel’s unreasonable refusal to submit to chemical testing as required by sec. 343.305, Stats. 1975.
On this appeal Neitzel asserts that he was entitled to consult counsel before deciding to take or refuse to take a chemical test for intoxication as provided by sec. 343.-305, et seq.
We conclude that for this purpose no right to counsel is afforded by Wisconsin law. By reason of the implied…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Scales v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. KroeningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WalstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- State v. NordnessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.