Legal Opinion

Williams v. Strickland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1996No. 93-17224PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge CHOY; Dissent by Judge POOLE.

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Robert Williams appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against his minimum wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (“FLSA”). The district court held that Williams, who spent six months at an Adult Rehabilitation Center of the Salvation Army, was never an employee of the Salvation Army for purposes of the FLSA. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

I

We consider the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, Williams. Jesinger…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Walling v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Qualls v. Blue Cross Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Williams v. StricklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. DesimoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Jacqueline Benjamin v. B & H EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Mark Fochtman v. Hendren Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  4. Julian v. Swift Transp. Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
  5. Ralph Johnson v. The National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API