Legal Opinion
Julian v. Swift Transp. Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 28, 2018No. CV-16-00576-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, Senior United States District Judge
Plaintiffs are a group of approximately 10,000 truck drivers who worked as "trainee drivers" for Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. Plaintiffs were not paid for attending the first day of a mandatory three-day orientation nor were they paid for many hours during a behind-the-wheel training period. Swift seeks summary judgment that Plaintiffs were not entitled to pay for the first day of orientation. Both parties seek summary judgment regarding Plaintiffs' unpaid hours during the behind-the-wheel training period.
BAC…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
- Abarca v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
- Browne v. PAM Transport IncDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2020
- Gelin v. Baltimore County, State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Haworth v. New Prime, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.